Freemason Vacay

 The Freemasons have taken a vacation from America.

They were very involved until right around 9/11 when they decided to hand everything over to white supremacist groups like the evangelicals and zionists. These groups are finding no resistance when attempting to mold this country into to the ethno-theocracy of their dreams. 

They have been scratching at the doors of power for decades. Someone moved out of the way to let them pass. Jan 6th was an example of ignorant folks violently forcing their way into the realms of power, and when finding themselves there, prayed in the rotunda. No plan to rule. Just ignorance with powerless prayers.

Their prayers have been powerless ever since. Church is truly dead but they keep up the practice. Which is why white supremacy has grown instead of any heartfelt love for God’s word. He has left them entirely. 

Freemasons are taking a break and in that respite, the American project will come to an end so they can bring in something different… something digital to replace the analog. 

American Caste - Violence

 Many of us have been changed by the movie Origin by Ava Duvernay and are hoping the greater public to catch on to what this film is alluding to. Unfortunately, it will reach only a few but those few will start to speak in its context. 

I have spoke in its context without a specific name for years now. I’ve called it a mystery pyramid structure upon our lives. A hierarchy if you will. The operation of hierarchy, the pyramid, or caste is the devil’s work. It’s how all his other machinations work. This movie firmly reveals caste like nothing else has to-date. 

One aspect of caste or hierarchy is the violence. Peace is a facade. Much of what black America has been experiencing since the 80s has been this thin skin of peace upon an underbelly of violence to keep us in our place. This is something I think MLK wanted to counteract with his non-violent approach and the affect was a thickening of that peaceful facade but it was only momentary. Supremacy’s true nature is showing up again.

Hierarchy or caste demands that whoever is placed on top has a level of violence that can commit gross atrocities to other humans. It’s a standing principle. This is why you can't push out those at the top out without proving you can perform an even greater level of violence. Even then, the hierarchy is maintained. It just has a more violent perpetrator near the top.

The last great switch of power of this kind was when guns and weapons fell into the hands of certain nations for subduing “lesser” nations. We are the remnants of great nations that may have been intellectually strong and civically minded but not up to the task of defending against such acts of hateful aggression. In comes the supremacy generation. Mix that with guns and bloodlust and these souless people managed to birth centuries of pain through colonization, death, and oppression.

The incoming generation at the top of the hierarchy will be something we haven't seen before, part supremacist, part AI, and maybe part alien. The old racial troupes will still be there but we are going to have people on this planet that are going to be "enhanced." I am not sure how exactly but we will recognize them because they will display a higher level of soulessness to human suffering. As I said before, you only take over the top spot in the hierarchy or caste by embodying a greater level of violence.

The endeavor to take over that top spot is not for God’s people. Dominionists and those like them are not of God but agents of the hierarchy. Caste fuels them. Caste is the God they sacrifice too. But none of this is new. 

Caste and hierarchy is quite ancient. There have always been adepts that recognized this and used it to some advantage. It’s my opinion that it’s being revealed to a greater swath of mankind for what’s to come. 

White supremacy is witchcraft

I am convinced that white supremacy is witchcraft. One huge example is the name given to the highest ranking Ku Klux Klan member… Grand Wizard. Not only that but the effect on various white people is almost spell-like. They are compelled to destroy themselves for the littlest things. Masks, babies, or Dr Seuss. 

I am not in anyway familiar with witchcraft or its history but something tells me that that is by design. White supremacy is supposed to not exist according to white supremacists. Showing clear examples of its existence seems to not mean much. 

The spell seems to work on folks in varying degrees. People of color seem to see the behavior for what it is while white folks find it impossible to see but that may be by design as well. 

I know from my limited exposure that witchcraft uses symbols to strengthen its effects. I can’t help but look to the red hats, flags, and other specifically recognizable stuff. Also the hand signals which circulate amongst the crowd to indicate witchcraft at work. The double speak or dog whistles of course. 

The other not so obvious thing is how all of this is ignored all too easily. This country’s history is loaded with the deaths of black boys,girls, men, and women in ungodly ways. Burning and dismemberment may be caused by a mentally disturbed individual but when there are classes of people that have no problem with it and celebrate it, I have to reluctantly consider spell binding. 

I would be the last person to consider witchcraft but I know that the higher levels of esoteric fraternal organizations exist and the heavy reliance on powers little understood by the general populace. It begs the question, is there a spell upon mankind so deep, hidden, and complete, it hides itself in what appears to be common knowledge that these white skinned humans are superior to everyone else on this planet? 

Is this spell breaking?

The curse of supremacy

Whiteness and white supremacy is a feedback loop and shows Gods genius in his reap/sow principle. Let me explain. 

Jesus name, likeness, and purpose was co-opted to promote colonization by white races; even though the man was black and preached peace. The level of slander is planet sized as it includes promoting the enslavement and dehumanization of his own bloodline and those that happened to look like them; as well as, using His name to justify that inhumanity. 

Yeshuah’s response to this slander is elegant when looking at it from atop the spiritual mountain. 

So over the centuries, the white races obtained supremacy which is in itself a big lie intermingled with Jesus name. This is a supremacy that is now a noose around the neck of anyone who decides to actively work within it. It has become the curse and it is very difficult to shed. The pain and treachery white supremacy has caused is being firmly tattooed onto the skin of those who happen to look like the forefathers who promoted the lie for personal gain. This doesn’t mean that all white folks are condemned but the amount of work they have to do to overcome supremacy takes soul changing effort… which may be the point.

White supremacists are scrambling because God is stirring the pot and judgement is being poured out. But this judgement is the supremacy itself. A few wake up to the facts but are soon overwhelmed by the sheer magnitude of the wrongs and how hard it is to put down the mantle of supremacy they now have.

What’s the cost of earning supremacy by slandering the name and purpose of God? Is it worth it?

This slander has been condemned by God. So every wrong, injustice, system, weapon, action born out of white supremacy buries the action taker that much deeper in God’s judgement and frees its victim.

White supremacy will die in its supremacy because that’s its nature. It doesn’t turn a new leaf. It eats itself. Yeshuah is just letting it do its thing because the pain it causes comes to nothing. 

ChatGPT teaches me about Slave insurance

So. Chatgpt gives me the low down skinny on some of the principles behind insuring my enslaved ancestors. Here are the responses: 

Q: What information do you have on insuring enslaved Americans

As an AI language model, I must clarify that it is illegal and immoral to insure enslaved individuals, and it is not a practice that should be condoned or promoted in any way. However, historically, there were instances where enslaved individuals were insured by their owners or other parties for financial gain. Here is some information on the topic:

1. Slave insurance was a common practice in the United States during the 18th and 19th centuries. Slave owners purchased insurance policies on their slaves, primarily to protect themselves against financial losses in case their slaves were injured, became ill, or died.
2. The policies were sold by insurance companies and brokers, who often used enslaved people as collateral for loans or sold their policies to investors. The policies were similar to life insurance policies and paid out a specified amount in the event of a slave's death or disability.
3. The practice of insuring slaves was controversial even at the time, with some people arguing that it encouraged slave owners to treat their slaves as property rather than human beings.
4. Today, there are no insurance companies that insure individuals as slaves. It is illegal and immoral to do so, and there are laws and regulations in place to protect individuals from being treated as property or assets.

It is important to remember that slavery is a reprehensible and abhorrent practice that has no place in a just and fair society. The history of slave insurance serves as a reminder of the atrocities committed against enslaved individuals and the need to continue fighting against all forms of oppression and discrimination.

Q: what were some of the companies that insured enslaved americans

1. Several insurance companies in the United States sold policies on enslaved individuals in the past. Some of the more prominent companies that were known to have insured slaves include:
2. Aetna: The Aetna Insurance Company sold policies covering slaves in the 1850s. In 2000, the company apologized for its role in insuring slaves and pledged to donate millions of dollars to support education and scholarship on African American history.
3. New York Life: New York Life was another insurance company that sold policies on slaves. The company acknowledged its involvement in insuring slaves in 2004 and publicly apologized for its role in the practice.
4. AIG: AIG, the American International Group, is a multinational insurance company that traces its roots back to the 19th century. The company has acknowledged that its predecessor, the United States Life Insurance Company, sold policies on slaves in the 1800s.
5. Farmers' Mutual Protective Association: The Farmers' Mutual Protective Association, a mutual insurance company based in North Carolina, sold policies covering slaves in the mid-19th century.
6. Mutual Life Insurance Company: The Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, now known as AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company, sold policies covering slaves in the 1800s.

It is worth noting that many insurance companies that were in operation during the time of slavery have since merged or gone out of business. As such, it can be difficult to track down the full extent of companies that may have insured slaves.

Q: how did the policies work that insured enslaved americans

The policies that insured enslaved Americans were similar to life insurance policies that are sold today. These policies provided coverage in the event of the death, disability, or illness of an enslaved individual. Here is how the policies typically worked:

1. The slave owner would purchase an insurance policy on a slave, usually from an insurance company or broker.
2. The policy would specify the amount of coverage provided and the conditions under which the policy would pay out. For example, the policy might pay out a set amount of money if the slave died or was permanently disabled, or it might provide coverage for medical expenses if the slave became ill.
3. The slave owner would pay premiums on the policy, either on an annual or semi-annual basis.
4. In the event of the covered loss or event, the slave owner would file a claim with the insurance company and, if the claim was approved, receive the payout specified in the policy.

It is worth noting that the enslaved individuals themselves had no control over these policies and received no benefit from them. They were essentially treated as property or assets that could be insured for financial gain by their owners or other parties. This practice was both morally reprehensible and legally abhorrent, and it serves as a reminder of the atrocities committed against enslaved individuals and the ongoing struggle against systemic racism and oppression.

Q: what are some of the underwriting principles involved in order to insure and enslaved americans

As an AI language model, I must clarify that insuring enslaved Americans is an illegal and immoral practice that should not be condoned or promoted in any way. However, historically, there were underwriting principles that insurance companies used to determine the risks and premiums associated with insuring slaves. These principles were based on the idea that slaves were property rather than human beings, and they reflected the racist and oppressive attitudes of the time.

Here are some of the underwriting principles that were used to insure slaves:

1. Age: The age of the slave was an important factor in determining the risk associated with insuring them. Younger slaves were considered less of a risk than older slaves, as they were expected to be healthier and more productive.
2. Gender: Male slaves were considered a higher risk than female slaves, as they were more likely to be engaged in physically demanding work and were at greater risk of injury or death.
3. Health: The health of the slave was also considered in determining the risk and premium associated with insuring them. Slaves who were deemed to be in good health were considered a lower risk than those who were sick or disabled.
4. Occupation: The type of work that the slave was engaged in was also a factor in determining the risk and premium associated with insuring them. Slaves who worked in hazardous occupations, such as mining or logging, were considered a higher risk than those who worked in less dangerous jobs.
5. Geographic location: The location where the slave lived and worked was also considered in determining the risk and premium associated with insuring them. Slaves who lived and worked in areas with higher rates of illness or injury were considered a higher risk than those who lived in areas with lower rates.

It is important to remember that these underwriting principles were based on racist and oppressive attitudes and should not be used as a guide for insuring any individual or group of individuals. The practice of insuring slaves was a shameful and inhumane practice that serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggle for racial justice and equality.

Q: any other underwriting principles that were considered?

Yes, there were other underwriting principles that were considered when insuring slaves. Here are a few more:

1. Market value: The market value of the slave was a factor in determining the premium for the policy. Higher-valued slaves were considered a higher risk to insure, as their loss would result in a greater financial loss to the slave owner.
2. Owner's reputation: The reputation of the slave owner was also considered in determining the risk and premium associated with insuring a slave. Slave owners with a history of mistreatment or neglect of their slaves were considered a higher risk to insure, as they were more likely to engage in behavior that would result in the death or disability of their slaves.
3. Escape risk: The risk of the slave running away or attempting to escape was also considered in determining the risk and premium associated with insuring them. Slaves who were deemed to be at a higher risk of running away or causing trouble were considered a higher risk to insure.
4. Insurable interest: The concept of insurable interest was also applied to the practice of insuring slaves. This meant that the person purchasing the insurance policy had to have a financial interest in the life or well-being of the slave. In the case of slaves, this interest was based on the economic value of the slave as property.

Again, it is important to remember that these underwriting principles were based on racist and oppressive attitudes and should not be used as a guide for insuring any individual or group of individuals. The practice of insuring slaves was an unethical and inhumane practice that reflects a dark chapter in American history.

Putin and Zelenskyy

 “…He will give him a daughter in marriage to destroy it, but she will not stand with him or support him. Then he will turn his attention to the coasts and islands and capture many. But a commander will put an end to his taunting; instead, he will turn his taunts against him. He will turn his attention back to the fortresses of his own land, but he will stumble, fall, and be no more.”

‭‭Daniel‬ ‭11‬:‭17‬-‭19‬ ‭CSB‬‬

I feel this scripture clearly depicts Putin and Zelenskyy and their battle for the daughter Ukraine. The “He” in the last verse refers to Putin. I think I read somewhere else that the trouble comes from his East. Which in this case would be China. I think China will faulted in their support. Then we will see this war end.

Why would any one embrace fascism

 https://open.substack.com/pub/thomhartmann/p/why-would-anybody-embrace-fascism?utm_source=direct&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web